OK, my SDRAM board finally arrived, and I can confirm, that is the correct location, everything works like a charm!zomgugoff wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 7:22 amThat is the correct locationAmigoMexicano wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:32 am I've been told that the boot.rom file goes inside: /media/fat/PC8801mk2SR
I still can't use this core, until my SDRAM board arrives, so I can't check this for sure.
So, where does it go?
PC88 Core
- AmigoMexicano
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 3:06 am
Re: PC88 Core
--
From Mexico City... AmigoMexicano!
(Yes, the same from all other retro forums)
*MiSTer FPGA Owner since April 2020*
From Mexico City... AmigoMexicano!
(Yes, the same from all other retro forums)
*MiSTer FPGA Owner since April 2020*
-
- Core Developer
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 9:20 am
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
- Contact:
Re: PC88 Core
@Artemio
I didn't know this.
The circuit equivalent to my uPD765 is made by hard wired so that the same operation is performed based on the specifications, and Micro code is not used.
I didn't know this.
The circuit equivalent to my uPD765 is made by hard wired so that the same operation is performed based on the specifications, and Micro code is not used.
- tontonkaloun
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: PC88 Core
The correct location is also '/media/fat/bootrom/PC8801mk2SR.rom' (just rename 'boot.rom')AmigoMexicano wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:47 pmOK, my SDRAM board finally arrived, and I can confirm, that is the correct location, everything works like a charm!zomgugoff wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 7:22 amThat is the correct locationAmigoMexicano wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:32 am I've been told that the boot.rom file goes inside: /media/fat/PC8801mk2SR
I still can't use this core, until my SDRAM board arrives, so I can't check this for sure.
So, where does it go?
-
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:17 pm
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: PC88 Core
hi
perhaps can you take an eye on amstrad cpc 765 component to merge to a good 765 one
perhaps can you take an eye on amstrad cpc 765 component to merge to a good 765 one
CPC-Power Staff
-
- Core Developer
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 9:20 am
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
- Contact:
Re: PC88 Core
I don't know the architecture of amstrad cpc. Is the uPD765 core of amstrad cpc free to use various sector sizes? The PC-88 uses the maximum disk capacity, or for reasons such as preventing illegal copying and other reasons, the sector size changes from track to track, the number of sectors changes, and the single density/double density changes. The D88 format is a flexible format that can support this, and my core Disk emulator also supports it.
-
- Top Contributor
- Posts: 468
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:17 pm
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
Re: PC88 Core
@puu
yes amstrad can use sector size 0 to 6 (128 to 8192 bytes) with only 6304 max used per track
generaly it's 9 sectors x 512 bytes (size 2) = 4.5 KB per track x 40 tracks = 180 KB (178 KB free with 2 KB reserved for FAT)
yes amstrad can use sector size 0 to 6 (128 to 8192 bytes) with only 6304 max used per track
generaly it's 9 sectors x 512 bytes (size 2) = 4.5 KB per track x 40 tracks = 180 KB (178 KB free with 2 KB reserved for FAT)
CPC-Power Staff
Re: PC88 Core
Are all disk write operations delayed? I tried to create a user disk for Zeliard, but it kept failing part way through. I checked the disk emu screen (F11) and saw the red progress bar start shortly after that.
-
- Core Developer
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 9:20 am
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
- Contact:
Re: PC88 Core
All FDDs are written to SDRAM once and then delayed back to the image. If the red progress bar goes to the far right, the write back is complete, but if there is another write during the write back, the write back should be repeated again.
From the FDC's point of view, writing to SDRAM is always performed normally whether it is writing back or not.
If you are worried, select EJECT to write back again.
From the FDC's point of view, writing to SDRAM is always performed normally whether it is writing back or not.
If you are worried, select EJECT to write back again.
Re: PC88 Core
I wonder why the write operation is failing... Can anyone list other games that have user disk creation?puu wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2020 3:38 pm All FDDs are written to SDRAM once and then delayed back to the image. If the red progress bar goes to the far right, the write back is complete, but if there is another write during the write back, the write back should be repeated again.
From the FDC's point of view, writing to SDRAM is always performed normally whether it is writing back or not.
If you are worried, select EJECT to write back again.
-
- Core Developer
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 9:20 am
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
- Contact:
Re: PC88 Core
Did you use an existing image for the user disk? Did you create a new one?
What kind of media type (2D/2DD/2HD) did you choose when newly created? In the era of PC-88, the mainstream is 2D, so I think there is no problem if you choose 2D unless otherwise specified. FDC is doing PIO transfer with sub CPU, but I think that it may not work because Z80 is so hard for 2HD 's 500kbps transmit speed.
What kind of media type (2D/2DD/2HD) did you choose when newly created? In the era of PC-88, the mainstream is 2D, so I think there is no problem if you choose 2D unless otherwise specified. FDC is doing PIO transfer with sub CPU, but I think that it may not work because Z80 is so hard for 2HD 's 500kbps transmit speed.
Re: PC88 Core
I tried new images of each type. They all failed.puu wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2020 3:57 am Did you use an existing image for the user disk? Did you create a new one?
What kind of media type (2D/2DD/2HD) did you choose when newly created? In the era of PC-88, the mainstream is 2D, so I think there is no problem if you choose 2D unless otherwise specified. FDC is doing PIO transfer with sub CPU, but I think that it may not work because Z80 is so hard for 2HD 's 500kbps transmit speed.
- tontonkaloun
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: PC88 Core
@Puu
hello
I saw on your site that there was a new version of the core, but the download link is not functional
hello
I saw on your site that there was a new version of the core, but the download link is not functional
-
- Core Developer
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 9:20 am
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
- Contact:
Re: PC88 Core
Sorry, since the size of the uploaded file was unusually large, I confirmed that a huge .stp file for debugging was attached, so I deleted it and re-uploaded it.
- tontonkaloun
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
- tontonkaloun
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: PC88 Core
Hello Mr. Puu,
I saw the new version of the core pc8801 on your site. It is impossible to compile it
I saw the new version of the core pc8801 on your site. It is impossible to compile it
- tontonkaloun
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
- tontonkaloun
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
- tontonkaloun
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2020 7:38 pm
- Has thanked: 153 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: PC88 Core
Hi !
Puu ! I have synthesized the last core and everything seems to work with internal SD, but the characters do not appear on the screen, just the cursor or the underlined_cursor, no chars, when in the previous version everything was seen and worked correctly.
My pc8801mk2sr.rom is 393,2 kB (393216 bytes)
What should be the correct order of the ROMs, for it to work in this new version?
Thanks a lot in advance !
Puu ! I have synthesized the last core and everything seems to work with internal SD, but the characters do not appear on the screen, just the cursor or the underlined_cursor, no chars, when in the previous version everything was seen and worked correctly.
My pc8801mk2sr.rom is 393,2 kB (393216 bytes)
What should be the correct order of the ROMs, for it to work in this new version?
Thanks a lot in advance !
Re: PC88 Core
@LeftEmpty. I have been reading the thread patiently but finally I am not clear on the question of the font file. I have been doing tests with very discreet results.
It would be interesting to clarify as far as possible how to cook the final ROM and the font.rom issue, I still do not understand how with the previous version it worked correctly.
Anyway, Thanks very much for your help.
It would be interesting to clarify as far as possible how to cook the final ROM and the font.rom issue, I still do not understand how with the previous version it worked correctly.
Anyway, Thanks very much for your help.
Re: PC88 Core
The font.rom found around is 6KB and is, I suspect, a stack of the two files Puu uses for his rom file.
Splitting the file manually (using an hex editor for instance, at address #0800) should do the trick. To be sure, once you're done with your electronic butchery, you can check whether the font.rom is 2048 bytes long and the graphfont.bin is 4096 bytes long.
I haven't built my own new pc88.rom to test yet, so this is just theory!
Splitting the file manually (using an hex editor for instance, at address #0800) should do the trick. To be sure, once you're done with your electronic butchery, you can check whether the font.rom is 2048 bytes long and the graphfont.bin is 4096 bytes long.
I haven't built my own new pc88.rom to test yet, so this is just theory!
-
- Core Developer
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 9:20 am
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
- Contact:
Re: PC88 Core
6kB font.rom contains 2kB 8x8dot font and 4kB 8x16dot font in this order.
Therefore, it is necessary to remove the first 2kB.
The quickest way is to delete addresses 0 to 7ff with a binary editor, but if linux can be used
split -b 2048 font.rom
Since it is divided into xaa, xab, xac every 2kB,
cat xab xac >font.bin
I think you can do it by connecting the two back with.
Therefore, it is necessary to remove the first 2kB.
The quickest way is to delete addresses 0 to 7ff with a binary editor, but if linux can be used
split -b 2048 font.rom
Since it is divided into xaa, xab, xac every 2kB,
cat xab xac >font.bin
I think you can do it by connecting the two back with.
Re: PC88 Core
Hi puu
You are very kind responding. I have not been able to find the famous 6KB font.rom and therefore I am still where I was. I give up.
In the end no one has answered my questions and if someone have the rom currently working. It was hard for me to find and put together the ROM for the previous version of the core, but if it is going to be so difficult I will leave the core for a while until the evil ROM appears.
You are very kind responding. I have not been able to find the famous 6KB font.rom and therefore I am still where I was. I give up.
In the end no one has answered my questions and if someone have the rom currently working. It was hard for me to find and put together the ROM for the previous version of the core, but if it is going to be so difficult I will leave the core for a while until the evil ROM appears.
Re: PC88 Core
Let's take a look. This is my last attempt.
-It is a real shame that such a small file ruins the entire core experience.If it cannot be used it is as if it does not exist, this core serves as a nice paperweight since nothing can be done., I just wanted to continue testing the core, as I say, it's a pity.
These are my files:
Any help with this problem was greatly appreciated
-It is a real shame that such a small file ruins the entire core experience.If it cannot be used it is as if it does not exist, this core serves as a nice paperweight since nothing can be done., I just wanted to continue testing the core, as I say, it's a pity.
These are my files:
Code: Select all
8192 n88_3.rom
8192 n88_2.rom
8192 n88_1.rom
8192 n88_0.rom
32768 mk2sr_n88.rom
8192 mk2sr_n88_0.rom
32768 mk2sr_n80.rom
131072 kanji2.rom
131072 kanji1.rom
2048 font.rom
8192 disk.rom
4096 graphfont.bin