Re: Turrican II AGA Scrolling Issues
Here is the source
https://github.com/MiSTer-devel/Minimig-AGA_MiSTer
So go fix it
It always staggers me people think whining about the fix not being made will motivate a dev to go and fix it
The online community for MiSTer FPGA enthusiasts
https://misterfpga.org/
Here is the source
https://github.com/MiSTer-devel/Minimig-AGA_MiSTer
So go fix it
It always staggers me people think whining about the fix not being made will motivate a dev to go and fix it
I've seen numerous times on this forum when talking about a problem/request results in a positive outcome (or at least an attempt at achieving one).
Yes, but if your sole contributions to the forum are complaining about something not working (you see this with github users too), don't be surprised if you get short shrift.
I don't see anything wrong with somebody making an account only because they care about one particular issue. It's not "complaining" but bug reporting, and this one has been a confirmed good catch.
If you'd like to split semantic hair over whether his tone was "whiny", rude, or in any other way disturbed the sacred FPGA etiquette then go ahead. I'm only interested in the fact that this thread got bumped, which is a good thing.
akeley wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 3:18 pmI don't see anything wrong with somebody making na account only because they care about one particular issue. It's not "complaining" but bug reporting, and this one has been a confirmed good catch.
If you'd like to split semantic hair over whether his tone was "whiny", rude, or in any other way disturbed the sacred FPGA etiquette then go ahead. I'm only interested in the fact that this thread got bumped, which is a good thing.
The first post was useful bug reporting. The second one "one year later, still no fix" was whining.
jamespo wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2024 1:05 pmakeley wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 3:18 pmI don't see anything wrong with somebody making na account only because they care about one particular issue. It's not "complaining" but bug reporting, and this one has been a confirmed good catch.
If you'd like to split semantic hair over whether his tone was "whiny", rude, or in any other way disturbed the sacred FPGA etiquette then go ahead. I'm only interested in the fact that this thread got bumped, which is a good thing.
The first post was useful bug reporting. The second one "one year later, still no fix" was whining.
I was just asking. A year is a long time, maybe someone new would see it.