Re: MiSTer Multisystem - All-in-One System
Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2021 10:45 pm
Any idea how much the all in one bundle will cost in advance? want to start setting aside because I don't imagine it'll be cheap with all the addons etc
The online community for MiSTer FPGA enthusiasts
https://misterfpga.org/
It's good and will also cool any SDD / HDD / storage that's fitted to the CASE B design. The fan cooling in general is much more than required as the DE10 is also still fitted with heatsink, I tend to always run the fan at 3.3v so it's totally silent. You could probably even use a regular fan running at 3.3v and it would also be almost silent. That said, the Noctua is a nice fan and should last a very long time in this configuration, well worth the extra money.
Neil is adding a pre-order page up on his website rmcretro.store in the next few weeks, that should list all the options for Multisystem + enclosure + Meanwell PSU etc.peterkozmd wrote: ↑Sun Sep 12, 2021 10:45 pm Any idea how much the all in one bundle will cost in advance? want to start setting aside because I don't imagine it'll be cheap with all the addons etc
Thank you, I can understand why case B is a tidier option, it's quite easy to internally route the SCART cable and for mass storage options. I still like the original case too.
That's a great question, Initially the enclosure will need to be 3D printed, it's just the most sensible option until we can see if a tooled design is even a viable thing to do. Tooling would be quite expensive for an enclosure of this size and that also means it's fixed (we would have to decide on Option A or B for tooling). With 3D printing you can at least make changes or improvements without needing to change tooling.
Since the DE-10 Nano alone has now become a good 20% more expensive, it is better to count on 400 than 300 Dolloar. In my opinion, however, it makes no sense to purchase the DE10 there, it should actually be cheaper in the USA.peterkozmd wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:11 pm Yeah still waiting for the final price added up with board,power supply,case plus nano and i assume the extra addon modules. So literally everything included out the box. Really eager to know how much the complete cost will be for everything included. Anyone have any idea the total damage estimate for everything? 300? or upwards of 400 usd?
Yes, these were Low voltage versions of the High voltage SNAC and user ports, they have now been integrated into the expansion slot and you just have a physical switch to select if it's running the low voltage or high voltage expansion - it can also detect this switch position on the expansion slot so the software / core can know what's connected and how it should be used etc. It's also less likely to cause problems if it's all just the edge slot rather than the 10 pin headers, they would have been bent or shorted out at some point.german_user wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 2:16 pm I noticed that the final board design is missing the two 10 pin headers next to the expansion port. Are these signals now lost, or have they been fully integrated into the slot?
Yes, exactly. The DE10-nano will be lower cost in the US. They are imported into the UK / Europe and seem to have a higher cost here because of that. You can't get a 'Volume discount' unless you buy a really big number of them, the price the big distributors have it listed is a really good buy price for the DE10-Nano as it's also subsidised by Intel for the educational / university sector.german_user wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 2:29 pmSince the DE-10 Nano alone has now become a good 20% more expensive, it is better to count on 400 than 300 Dolloar. In my opinion, however, it makes no sense to purchase the DE10 there, it should actually be cheaper in the USA.peterkozmd wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 1:11 pm Yeah still waiting for the final price added up with board,power supply,case plus nano and i assume the extra addon modules. So literally everything included out the box. Really eager to know how much the complete cost will be for everything included. Anyone have any idea the total damage estimate for everything? 300? or upwards of 400 usd?
In my opinion, some aspects of the design would unnecessarily increase tooling costs, I've reviewed the STL's a bit for fun... It looks like you would need a couple slides to accommodate the vents and openings from multiple angles, but I could be wrong. I'm not an expert, just work in plastics and see it from sort of that perspective. Was the 3d printable case designed with injection molding in mind?multisystem wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 9:51 amThat's a great question, Initially the enclosure will need to be 3D printed, it's just the most sensible option until we can see if a tooled design is even a viable thing to do. Tooling would be quite expensive for an enclosure of this size and that also means it's fixed (we would have to decide on Option A or B for tooling). With 3D printing you can at least make changes or improvements without needing to change tooling.
It would be great to hear if people are happy with a 3D printed enclosure, I think it looks quite good in a matte finish, it's strong and I have tuned the quality for best print time/cost so it should be a viable option to print/sell without costing too much.
multisystem wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 9:51 amThat's a great question, Initially the enclosure will need to be 3D printed, it's just the most sensible option until we can see if a tooled design is even a viable thing to do. Tooling would be quite expensive for an enclosure of this size and that also means it's fixed (we would have to decide on Option A or B for tooling). With 3D printing you can at least make changes or improvements without needing to change tooling.
It would be great to hear if people are happy with a 3D printed enclosure, I think it looks quite good in a matte finish, it's strong and I have tuned the quality for best print time/cost so it should be a viable option to print/sell without costing too much.
Exactly the opposite, I always design for the 3D printing process first, especially it it's going to be printed on FDM machines as they have even more limitations that SLS does not.
The 3D printed design currently has no draught angles for moulding and many of the wall thickness choices are specifically for the standard 0.4mm FDM nozzle size, so they produce strong walls and solid infill where needed. If it was changed to moulding lots of these things would be changed for the moulding process and to limit mould cooling problems and defects etc.aberu wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 5:16 pm In my opinion, some aspects of the design would unnecessarily increase tooling costs, I've reviewed the STL's a bit for fun... It looks like you would need a couple slides to accommodate the vents and openings from multiple angles, but I could be wrong. I'm not an expert, just work in plastics and see it from sort of that perspective.
Dont see the amazon price, but mouser is about 171$ for the DE10-Nano Kit. Digikey is about 175$.peterkozmd wrote: ↑Mon Sep 13, 2021 4:28 pm Here's an amazon link i think i'll order from https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07B89YHSB/
Is this their any cheaper places to get this? also with this and the mister system i should be set right? Sorry new to this. Thanks for the help.
Very cool! Thanks for the insight. The company I work at is primarily doing prototyping and production of medical and gun parts (burning both ends of the candle I suppose) for mold design, tooling, molding, and finishing all in one shop. However, we are newer to the 3d printing game, mostly just use it internally for fixtures and end of arm attachments, so I was mostly commenting as a newbie even from my indirect experience, glad I recognized correctly that it was a DFAM part.multisystem wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 8:53 am The 3D printed design currently has no draught angles for moulding and many of the wall thickness choices are specifically for the standard 0.4mm FDM nozzle size, so they produce strong walls and solid infill where needed. If it was changed to moulding lots of these things would be changed for the moulding process and to limit mould cooling problems and defects etc.
I do this with most projects, for example below is a product we recently started as 3D printed (Left of the image - it's specifically designed to 3D print quickly), then the design was altered to produce a 3D enclosure that was going to be tooled, this could be 3D printed (middle image) but it was just to prove the models were ready to be tooled. - Then the finished tooled case is on the Right.
multisystem wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 12:20 pm We are trying to make sure we have enough filament and the right colours in stock for launch, any feedback on what colour and case style you prefer would be most appreciated, thank you.
Style A or B -
And a close up of the 3D printed enclosure quality, the light highlights very small layer changes and tiny defects, you don't really see these with the eye but I want to give an idea of what we are aiming for - all top layers are smooth, layer height is 0.2mm and the finish is matte PLA.
These are not post processed, so they come off the 3D printer exactly as in the images, that way we can keep costs down and if anyone wants to sand/polish/smooth or paint they can do this themselves.
Neil is going to put up some poles to capture votes on Twitter if anyone also wishes to show a preference there, thank you.
Great, nice to see some interest in the White, I like it too.
If that would happen with my white version over the years I will use retrobright like I did with my PC- engines before, they look brandnew after when it is done
Style A is what I would take, looks so different then all other consoles, and the Mister FPGA is really different then all othersmultisystem wrote: ↑Tue Sep 14, 2021 12:20 pm We are trying to make sure we have enough filament and the right colours in stock for launch, any feedback on what colour and case style you prefer would be most appreciated, thank you.
Multisystem_enclosure_colour_options_vote1.jpg
Style A or B -
Multisystem_enclosure_style_options_vote2.jpg
And a close up of the 3D printed enclosure quality, the light highlights very small layer changes and tiny defects, you don't really see these with the eye but I want to give an idea of what we are aiming for - all top layers are smooth, layer height is 0.2mm and the finish is matte PLA.
These are not post processed, so they come off the 3D printer exactly as in the images, that way we can keep costs down and if anyone wants to sand/polish/smooth or paint they can do this themselves.
Multisystem_enclosure_close_up_finish_quality.jpg
Neil is going to put up some poles to capture votes on Twitter if anyone also wishes to show a preference there, thank you.