Starting a separate thread for this.
flynnsbit wrote: ↑Tue Jun 28, 2022 1:26 amI don't think we are close to that yet and releasing something like that would be unfair for the developers who are actively working this publicly here. I feel like having access to something like that for those who can't dive into the os options and understand when something is a core bug and when something is "DOS being DOS" would cause too many false reports of stability.
I am putting effort into it though and trying to find the best combination of OS + Games + frontend (MyMenu).
I've built the following images:
IBM DOS 5
FreeDOS 1.3 (XT specific build from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOVLlMQs9f8)
MS DOS 6.22
Compaq DOS 3.31
(working on PC-DOS 2000)There are issues with each above depending on what you are trying to accomplish. I would suggest downloading 86Box and then you can configure it very close to the core:
Machine type: 8080
Machine: [8088] Juko ST
Speed: whatever
Display: [ISA] CGA
Sound: [ISA] Adlib
HD Controller: [ISA] PC/XT XTIDE
FD Controller: Internal controller
Hard Disks: IDE mount a hdd.img
Floppy: mount any floppy img or install from WinworldI've attached an example of my 86Box config for reference. Doing it this way, you can quickly install different os from floppy image and then just copy the hdd.img to your mister and test. This allows easy access to both the hdd.img and floppy drives to changing the images quickly.
Plug-and-play images will eventually come. It needs some love, and probably IDE support before the larger audience gets a hold of this. My opinion.
flynnsbit wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 3:46 pmArchive.org "tanfiles".
You're welcome.
=== Games:
Most of the games are preconfigured for enhanced Tandy/PCjr graphics and
audio. Furthermore, most of these games should run fine on any Tandy 1000,
although some may be sluggish on a 4.77MHz processor.Games that required unreasonably fast Tandys to run at all, like a 12MHz
80286, have been removed. This includes some of the more demanding 3D titles,
like Stunts.There is a directory called GAMES/TECH which has a .zip of games that have
interesting programming or optimized special-effects. They are included as a
curiosity.
thisisamigaspeaking wrote: ↑Tue Jul 12, 2022 1:09 pmIs anyone working on a "Top 300" type archive of CGA, Tandy and EGA games?
akeley wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:28 pmThanks to flynnsbit's 500MB image, I was able to make one of my by-year collections specially for this core. It contains all the games from years 1981-1986, and most of 87, based on Total Dos Collection from last year.
It really is a very rough, early release - basically a dump of all the game directories organised per year, which are mostly untested (some are only in weird formats and won't even work). Anybody who wants a curated one should wait for flynnsbit's pack. There are two image versions, one with unpacked games, other using TDL launcher (long filenames, but zipped games). The latter says some files are corrupted so use at your own risk.
Still, it can be quite fun to browse, though the main issue is now the boot speed - it takes nearly 2 minutes, which is a pain when a game doesn't respond to CTRL+X / Q or some other way to go back to DOS and you need to restart (protip: in GW Basic games you can type "system" to go back to dos). I'm sure it will get better in time - I haven't even tried the unstable Turbo versions yet. You can also try to optimise the autoexec/config.sys further - atm it's full fo flynnsbit's WIP DOS wizardry, which might be helping with disk speed but also takes a while to load.
Any brave soul interested in trying it out should look for "play it by year msdos" on archive.org (with quotes).
akeley wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 7:03 pmNightShadowPT wrote: ↑Wed Aug 24, 2022 6:49 pmIs there any equivalent to the eXo/Flynn Top 300 DOS Pack for this core? (focusing on 8086 games)
https://archive.org/details/tdl-hdd
This is a different concept than the curated & tested stuff flynnsbit's doing (I believe his PCXT dedicated pack will apppear at some point too), but maybe somebody will find it useful too. It worked pretty well when I tested it, albeit a bit slow to boot. But I was using the old core releases, perhaps the new turbo versions have the boot speeds improved.